??RL tag question to CS:S leaders??

[JojoTheSlayer]

Okay am just wondering about the use of (RL) tags in CS.
Do you guyes want everyone under the "RL Clan tree" to use the RL tag or just those that play competetiv?

Also considering the training I took part in, yesterday I think, wouldnt it be an idea to deived up the teams in those that are gonna play competetiv vs dose that arnt... Am just thinking that this way those that "need" ( aka not just for fun ) to train togther, tactacly, ts coms commands etc gets to.

**************

If you guyes want everyone in RL to use the RL tag when playing you could just add a eg (RL)- or something else to make it easier to tell the diffrence between competior players and just "randoms" like myself. If you guyes feels its nessasery that is.

If you guyes dont want any other RLs, in other game RLs, to use the RL tag in CS then that is also okay whit me. Telling the diffrence between com and randoms would then not be an issue doh :)

But to be honoest I would prefer using the RL tag myself, but I can understand if not everyone feels this way condisering I, as a random, dont pay to play on the RL CS:S server.

[GuardianAnge1]

i think that EVERYONE should have [RL] on their name. We're all part of RL, some of us just play competitively.

[Neraj]

I agree with guardian, besides some days you might fall short of players and people who don't play CS all the time, might be your best, last hope for human kind :eek:

[Flufball]

[RL] is fine if you're playing on any game that RL has a clan for. Dosent make a differance, jsut that we have people who want to play publics rather than competetivly, and we need to cater for them as well :) (IMO, as I'm not a leet leadermabobin)

[JojoTheSlayer]

RL tags alround it is then ;) and thats good to hear.